Bitcoin gave rise to a completely new industry centered on blockchain technology alongside objectives of fostering digital currency. One of the most common arguments by players in the cryptocurrency market refers to the potential of decentralized solutions to replace conventional financial services. Although it is quite early to arrive at such conclusions, the DeFi vs.CeFi debate has caught the attention of many in the world of cryptocurrency. The following article discusses the differences between both of them to find out whether DeFi can outperform CeFi.
Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
Before diving into the debate of DeFi vs. CeFi, it is important to find out the definitions of both. DeFi or decentralized finance reflects on a movement or trend that focuses on fostering blockchain-based infrastructures alongside open-source software to create different types of financial services and products, including the traditional ones. The important services that would come under the scope of DeFi include payments, lending, trading, insurance, asset management, issuing money, and over-the-counter trading.
DeFi can enable communities to manage these services without the intervention of regulators, banks, and governments. The most prominent highlight of DeFi presently focuses on the development of financial applications on blockchain networks. Decentralized applications aim to integrate permissionless, secure, and trustless networks that can eradicate central authority for managing financial services.
Centralized Finance (CeFi)
The other entrant in the DeFi vs.CeFi debate, i.e., Centralized Finance (CeFi), involves users’ trust in centralized companies and institutions for storage of their funds to facilitate different services. The majority of CeFi solutions present in the market emphasize cryptocurrency trading with the prominence of other applications.
In most cases, CeFi service providers utilize Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) practices. These practices support compliance with legal precedents in the delivery of financial services. Different CeFi services follow operations with custodial wallets associated with the private keys of users. Popular crypto exchanges are the most prominent example of CeFi services that involve centralized entities focused on matching sellers and buyers.
The platforms offer necessary features alongside ensuring that users follow all the rules efficiently. As a result, the profits from transactions are shared by company stakeholders. Apart from trading services, companies under the scope of CeFi also provide services of borrowing, margin trading, lending, and many other financial services.
Similarities between CeFi and DeFi
Another important aspect before driving attention towards the DeFi vs. CeFi comparison refers to similarities between them. Both of them focus on the same financial services, and in some cases, end-users may or may not realize whether a crypto service depends on DeFi or CeFi infrastructure.
Furthermore, CeFi and DeFi also provide the same financial services group that includes spot trading, borrowing and lending, derivatives lending, payments, and margin trading. Both the platforms can help in creating intuitive interfaces for bringing newcomers onboard with limited complications.
Differences between CeFi and DeFi
Although there is considerable similarity in both trends’ fundamental goals, there are many prominent differences between them. Let us reflect on them in detail as follows.
CeFi projects are under the control of a single entity or group of entities. On the other hand, DeFi projects are under the governance of communities through different mechanisms.
In terms of features, DeFi vs. CeFi comparison becomes more prominent with unique features in each group. For instance, the majority of CeFi projects present custody solutions with dedicated service teams. On the other hand, DeFi platforms do not have a single authority due to non-custodial swaps, automated market-making, yield farming, and liquidity pools.
CeFi depends on KYC verification for regulatory compliance alongside the need for depending on comprehensive legal frameworks. Therefore, CeFi services are subject to numerous jurisdictions. On the other hand, DeFi is comparatively new and does not rely on comprehensive regulations. Furthermore, the decentralized nature of DeFi presents difficulties for imposing regulations on different DeFi markets.
Liquidity in CeFi projects involves matching buyers’ and sellers’ orders, just like stockbrokers or forex. On the other hand, DeFi does not conduct all trading activities automatically on blockchain. Decentralized Exchange platforms depend on AMMs, involving pre-funding of both sides of a trade by liquidity providers. The liquidity providers use the pre-funding as incentives for locating their funds. Subsequently, the trading fees are subject to sharing between liquidity providers who have to provide equal contribution values.
With the evolution of the cryptocurrency trading industry, challenges will evolve and will be addressed. At the same time, the overall ecosystem will continue to improve continuously. It is also important to know in the DeFi vs. CeFi debate that both of them will grab reliable positions in the cryptocurrency movement. Both of them promote open finance alongside offering attractive yields and transactions in a limited time. However, there are many prominent CeFi platforms in comparison to DeFi alternatives.
On the other hand, the DeFi industry has show staggering growth in recent years. Most importantly, new and lucrative DeFi platforms have constantly emerged while addressing the gaps between CeFi and DeFi. So, CeFi and DeFi are most likely to be on the same page in the future, with the question of user preferences as the primary differentiator.
101 Blockchains is the world’s leading online independent research-based network for Enterprise Blockchain Practitioners. We are a professional and trusted provider of enterprise blockchain research, advisory, and professional training.